Imitatio
Christi and Christian Hope
“We have this hope as an anchor for the
soul, firm and secure.” (Hebrews 6:19)
What is Christian hope?
The first thing we need to say is that the
adjective matters. Christian hope is both like and unlike natural hopes. Christian hope is a supernatural hope; it is
essentially linked to God, rooted in God’s promises. Like our natural hopes, Christian hope looks
forward to some good thing. It is the
goal, the good thing we anticipate, that distinguishes Christian hope from
natural hopes.
So what is it that Christians hope
for?
1.
In the words of countless beauty pageant winners, do we long for “world peace”? Jesus taught his disciples to pray for God’s
kingdom to come and for God’s will to be done on earth. Biblical scholars tell us that the “kingdom
of God” includes far more than absence of war.
God’s shalom means personal
and social well-being; it means wholeness and blessedness. The kingdom of God brings justice, both in
the sense of judgment against our sins and in fair distribution of good
things. Should we say that Christians
hope for the kingdom of God?
2. Do we want to
meet loved ones in heaven? (Or, like
Socrates, to meet famous persons and discuss philosophy with them?) This idea has been part of Christian thinking
from the beginning. In 1 Thessalonians,
which may be the first New Testament document written, Paul reassures the
Christians in Thessalonica that those believers who had “fallen asleep” were
not thereby cut off from God’s promised future.
He says that at the parousia
dead Christians would rise first, to be joined by those who were living at the
time of Christ’s return. Countless
Christian funeral sermons have assured believers that they will see the beloved
departed again. Is this the Christian
hope, to see and know those who have died?
3. Paul’s
correction of Thessalonian misunderstandings concerning resurrection
underscores the crucial importance of resurrection in Christian doctrine. In 1 Corinthians 15, Paul insists that if
there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Jesus has been raised, and
in that case Christian faith is useless. Should we say, then, that Christian hope is
hope for resurrection? Undoubtedly, many
ordinary believers would say they hope for “eternal life,” in the sense of
living forever.[1] We may conflate a hope for resurrection with
a hope to live forever. Is this the
Christian hope, that we will live again?
4. In 1
Corinthians 13:12, Paul says that in heaven we will see God “face to face” (in
contrast to seeing now “through a glass.”)
Thomas Aquinas and other Christian theologians have said that the
highest Christian aspiration is to know God directly, without intellectual
mediation: to “see” God. So perhaps the
Christian hope is not merely that we will live in heaven, but that we will
directly know God. Is this the Christian
hope, to experience beatific vision?
The
New Testament supports all these notions, and they are part of what we
anticipate. They are all partly right
answers. Nevertheless, I want to propose
another response. 1 John 3:2 says, “when
Christ appears, we will be like him,
for we will see him as he is,” (my emphasis) and the next verse connects being
like Christ with hope: “All who have this hope in him purify themselves…”
I
suggest that Christian hope aims at a familiar New Testament theme: being like
Christ, imitatio Christi. Christian ethics, from a virtue theory
perspective, is the pursuit of Christlikeness.
We want to be like Jesus. “Have
this mind in you which was also in Christ Jesus…” Paul says to the
Philippians. “Fix your eyes on Jesus,
the author and perfecter of faith…” says the writer of Hebrews.
Imitatio Christi is not an ethic of rules or laws, saying
“do this” or “don’t do that,” so much as a character goal. Christians are to grow into the virtues of
Jesus, the fruit of the Spirit. We are
to be like Jesus. On one hand, this is an impossibly high
goal. As Jesus said, we are to be
complete or perfect (teleios) lovers
(Mt 5:48). Like Paul, in this life we
are always pressing on toward the goal God has set before us (Phil 3:14). This side of resurrection, Christians are
people on the way, pilgrims.[2]
Hope
is a virtue for pilgrims. We do not
minimize the wonder or greatness of the goal.
Thus we are saved from the vice of presumption. But we also remember that Christian
pilgrimage is always supported by God’s grace.
So we avoid despair. In an
Aristotelian mean between presumption and despair, we live in hope.
[1]
Some biblical scholars have argued that “eternal life” as used in John has a
different, or at least richer, meaning than life that endures without end. These scholars say that in John’s gospel,
“eternal life” indicates a quality of life, life lived in intimate friendship
with God. On this view, “eternal life”
may or may not imply unending personal existence. I think it is safe to assume that few
ordinary believers have this idea in mind when they hope for eternal life.
[2]
What happens after the resurrection?
Some people imagine the eternal state as something static, but I imagine
it as one of eternal exploration of the wonders of God. We may always
be people on the way.
What are your thoughts on process theology? (inspired by Alfred North Whitehead's process philosophy) The second footnote seems, to me at least, to be how a process thinker might possibly understand eternity.
ReplyDeleteGood question. I think that, since God is the infinite being, human persons can spend eternity knowing God better and better.
ReplyDeleteAs I understand it, process theology says that God is continually in process, becoming as the universe becomes. Now, I think God is genuinely personal and interacts in love with created beings. So I don't believe in some kind of static Aristotelian God who eternally contemplates perfection (i.e. Godself). But I'm not happy with a process God who does not stand independent of the universe. The biblical God enters history to judge and redeem the universe, but is not to be identified with it.
Maybe this is an unfair misrepresentation of process thought.
Thank you for the reply!
DeleteI think that you gave a fair representation of process thought.